Quantcast
Channel: Relationships
Viewing all 3141 articles
Browse latest View live

Happy couples have these 3 things in common

$
0
0

Esther Perel is a renowned relationship expert who has worked with hundreds of couples around the world.

During her countless sessions with all different kinds of couples, Perel noticed a few key factors that happy relationships have in common:

1. They remain curious about each other

"Couples that are really thriving continue to be curious about each other. They don't claim to already know the other person. They don't pretend they know what you're going to say before you even open your mouth."

2. They are genuinely happy for their partner

"They also are people who are really able to treasure the happiness of the other even if it has nothing to do with them. I'm happy for you, for what's happening to you. That is generous, it is kind, and it really makes anybody want to come home for that matter." 

3. They maintain their own personal lives in a relationship

"They also are people who respect a lot of the individuality of each person. Meaning, they are couples who often have quite a large space where each person has worlds of their own... inner worlds of thought, of pursuits, hobbies, passions, or friendships. Rather than hungry people who each are trying to feed off each other."

"Those three elements, the freedom, the happiness for the other, and the admiration are essential elements of striving relationships," Perel concludes.

Watch the video above to hear Perel's full analysis.

Story by Aly Weisman, editing by Chelsea Pineda and Alana Kakoyiannis

INSIDER is on Facebook: Follow us here

SEE ALSO: A relationship expert explains why happy couples cheat

Join the conversation about this story »


A relationship expert explains 'the most important element in a relationship'

$
0
0

Esther Perel is a renowned relationship expert who has worked with hundreds of couples around the world.

After advising a countless number of them, Perel says a successful relationship can basically be boiled down to one key factor: trust.

"In the age of transparency, trust has become the most important element in a relationship," Perel told Business Insider. "Trust is also our ability to live with what we will never know. Fundamentally, there is something about trust that is a leap of faith."

She added that it's important to take the leap of faith.

"If we have to know everything, if we are constantly checking, if we are constantly on the lookout, then probably we'd never trust," Perel said. "So there is a moment of suspension, that is part of this thing called trust, which is why it is so fearful and so vulnerable to trust."

Story by Aly Weisman and editing by Kristen Griffin and Alana Kakoyiannis

INSIDER is on Facebook: Follow us here

SEE ALSO: A hotel in Japan is staffed by robots

Join the conversation about this story »

A relationship expert reveals the key to a thriving relationship

$
0
0

Esther Perel is a renowned relationship expert who has worked with hundreds of couples around the world.

During her countless sessions with all different kinds of pairs, Perel noticed a key factor that happy relationships have in common.

"The bottom line of what makes for a thriving relationship is probably similar across the board," Perel told Business Insider.

"The first thing is that we want to feel that we matter. I want to feel that I am valued, that I am recognized, that I am seen, that someone cares about me, that somebody notices what I do at work, that somebody lets me know that they have noticed what I do at work, and maybe even thank me or appreciate me for having done all of this," she said.

"Same in the home," Perel elaborated."Same in every relationship. We are creatures of meaning, and we need to know that we matter."

Watch the video above to hear Perel's full analysis.

Story by Aly Weisman and editing by Stephen Parkhurst and Alana Kakoyiannis

INSIDER is on Facebook: Follow us here

INSIDER is on YouTube: Subscribe here

SEE ALSO: Happy couples have these 3 things in common

Join the conversation about this story »

6 healthy relationship habits that most people think are toxic

$
0
0

couple selfie rio brazil

I wrote a post titled 6 Toxic Habits that Most People Think Are Normal. It became very successful.

The post also helped a lot of people. Since writing it, it’s generated a staggering amount of thank you emails, and no less than 20 people notified me that it inspired them to end their relationships (or even in a few cases, their marriages).

It was the wake up call these people needed to finally let go and accept that their relationship was gagging them with a s---spoon every day. And they deserved better.

(So I guess I’m a home-wrecker. Sweet.)

But the article also elicited a lot of questions like, “So if these habits ruin a relationship, what habits create a happy and healthy relationship?” and “Where’s an article on what makes a relationship great?” and “Mark, how did you get so handsome?”

These are important questions. And they deserve answers.

Granted, I have far more experience screwing up relationships than making them work well, but I still wanted to take a stab at a “healthy relationship” post. I didn’t want to just make it a (yet another) “learn to communicate and cuddle and watch sunsets and play with puppies together” type post.

You can find those posts just about everywhere. And honestly, those posts suck. If you love your partner, you shouldn’t have to be told to hold hands and watch sunsets together. This stuff should be automatic.

I wanted to write something different. I wanted to write about issues that are important in relationships but don’t receive enough airtime. Things like the role of fighting, hurting each other’s feelings, dealing with dissatisfaction or feeling the occasional attraction for other people. These are normal, everyday relationship issues that don’t get talked about because it’s far easier to talk about puppies and sunsets instead.

And so I wrote this article. This is the first article’s bizarro twin brother. That article explained that many of our culture’s tacitly accepted relationship habits secretly erode intimacy, trust and happiness. This article explains how traits that don’t fit our traditional narrative for what love is and what love should be are actually necessary ingredients for lasting relationship success.

Enjoy.

1. Letting some conflicts go unresolved

There’s this guy. His name is John Gottman. And he is like the Michael Jordan of relationship research. Not only has he been studying intimate relationships for more than 40 years, but he practically invented the field.

Gottman devised the process of “thin-slicing” relationships, a technique where he hooks couples up to all sorts of biometric devices and then records them having short conversations about their problems. Gottman then goes back and analyzes the conversation frame by frame looking at biometric data, body language, tonality and specific words chosen. He then combines all of this data together to predict whether your marriage sucks or not.

His “thin-slicing” process boasts a staggering 91% success rate in predicting whether newly-wed couples will divorce within 10 years — a staggeringly high result for any psychological research. His method went on to be featured in Malcolm Gladwell’s bestselling book Blink.

Gottman’s seminars also report a 50% higher success rate of saving troubled marriages than traditional marriage counseling. His research papers have won enough academic awards to fill the state of Delaware. And he’s written nine books on the subjects of intimate relationships, marital therapy and the science of trust.

coupleThe point is, when it comes to understanding what makes long-term relationships succeed, John Gottman will slam-dunk in your face and then sneer at you afterwards.

And the first thing Gottman says in almost all of his books is this: The idea that couples must communicate and resolve all of their problems is a myth.

In his research of thousands of happily married couples, some of whom have been married for 40+ years, he found time and again that most successful couples have persistent unresolved issues, unresolved issues that they’ve sometimes been fighting about for decades. Meanwhile many of the unsuccessful couples insisted on resolving f------ everything because they believed that there should be a void of disagreement between them. Pretty soon there was a void of a relationship too.

People like to fantasize about “true love.” But if there is such a thing, it requires us to sometimes accept things we don’t like.

Successful couples accept and understand that some conflict is inevitable, that there will always be certain things they don’t like about their partners or things they don’t agree with, and that this is fine. You shouldn’t need to feel the need to change somebody in order to love them. And you shouldn’t let some disagreements get in the way of what is otherwise a happy and healthy relationship.

The truth is, trying to resolve a conflict can sometimes create more problems than it fixes. Some battles are simply not worth fighting. And sometimes the most optimal relationship strategy is one of “live and let live.”

2. Being willing to hurt each other's feelings

My girlfriend is one of those women who spends a lot of time in front of the mirror. She loves to look amazing and I love for her to look amazing too (obviously).

Nights before we go out, she always comes out of the bathroom after an hour-long make-up/hair/clothes/whatever-women-do-in-there session and asks me how she looks. She’s usually gorgeous. But every once in a while, she looks bad. She tried to do something new with her hair or decided to wear a pair of boots that some flamboyant fashion designer from Milan thought were avant-garde. And it just doesn’t work.

When I tell her this, she usually gets pissed off. And as she marches back into the closet to redo everything and make us 30 minutes late, she spouts a bunch of four-letter words and sometimes even slings a few of them at me.

Men stereotypically lie in this situation to make their girlfriends/wives happy. But I don’t. Why? Because honesty in my relationship is more important to me than feeling good all of the time. The last person I should ever have to censor myself with is the woman I love.

Fortunately, I date a woman who agrees. She calls me out on my b------- sometimes, and it’s honestly one of the most important traits she offers me as a partner. Sure, my ego gets bruised and I b---- and complain and try to argue, but a few hours later I come sulking back and admit that she was right and holy crap she makes me a better person even though I hated hearing it at the time.

When our highest priority is to always make ourselves feel good, or to always make our partner feel good, then nobody ends up feeling good. And our relationships fall apart without us even knowing it.

couple men cuddleIt’s important to make something more important in your relationship than merely making each other feel good all of the time. The feel good stuff happens when you get the other stuff right. The sunsets and puppies, they happen when you get the more important stuff right: values, needs and trust.

If I feel smothered and need more time alone, I need to be capable of saying that without blaming her and she needs to be capable of hearing it without blaming me, despite the unpleasant feelings it may cause. If she feels that I’m cold and unresponsive to her, she needs to be capable of saying it without blaming me and I need to be capable of hearing it without blaming her, despite the unpleasant feelings it may generate.

These conversations are paramount to maintaining a healthy relationship that meets both people’s needs. With out them, we get lost and lose track of one another.

3. Being willing to end it

Romantic sacrifice is idealized in our culture. Show me almost any romantic movie and I’ll show you a desperate and needy character who treats themselves like dog s--- for the sake of being in love with someone.

The truth is our standards for what a “successful relationship” should be are pretty screwed up. If a relationship ends and someone’s not dead, then we view it as a failure, regardless of the emotional or practical circumstances present in the person’s lives. And that’s kind of insane.

Romeo and Juliet was originally written as satire to represent everything that’s wrong with young love and how irrational romantic beliefs can make you do stupid s--- like drink poison because your parents don’t like some girl’s parents. But somehow we look at this story as romantic.

It’s this kind of irrational idealization that leads people to stay with partners who are abusive or negligent, to give up on their own needs and identities, to make themselves into imaginary martyrs who are perpetually miserable, to suppress their own pain and suffering in the name of maintaining a relationship “until death do us part.”

Sometimes the only thing that can make a relationship successful is ending it at the appropriate time, before it becomes too damaging. And the willingness to do that allows us to establish the necessary boundaries to help ourselves and our partner grow together.

“Shoot myself to love you; if I loved myself I’d be shooting you.”

– Marilyn Manson

“Until death do us part” is romantic and everything, but when we worship our relationship as something more important than ourselves, our values, our needs and everything else in our lives, we create a sick dynamic where there’s no accountability.

We have no reason to work on ourselves and grow because our partner has to be there no matter what. And our partner has no reason to work on themselves and grow because we’re going to be there no matter what. It invites stagnation and stagnation equals misery.

4. Feeling attraction for people outside the relationship

Our cultural scripts for romance includes this sort of mental tyranny, where any mildly emotional or sexual thought not involving your partner amounts to high treason. Being in love is like a cult where you’re supposed to prefer drinking Kool Aid laced with cyanide to letting your thoughts wander to whether other religions may be true too.

As much as we’d like to believe that we only have eyes for our partner, biology says otherwise. Once we get past the honeymoon phase of starry eyes and oxytocin, the novelty of our partner wears off a bit. And unfortunately, human sexuality is partially wired around novelty.

couple argumentI get emails all the time from people in happy marriages/relationships who get blindsided by finding someone else attractive and they feel like horrible, horrible people because of it. Not only are we capable of finding multiple people attractive and interesting at the same time, but it’s a biological inevitability.

What isn’t an inevitability are our choices to act on it or not. Most of us, most of the time, choose to not act on those thoughts. And like waves, they pass through us and leave us with our partner very much the same way how they found us.

This triggers a lot of guilt in some people and a lot of irrational jealousy in others. Our cultural scripts tell us that once we’re in love, that’s supposed to be it, end of story. And if someone flirts with us and we enjoy it, or if we catch ourselves having an occasional errant sexy-time fantasy, there must be something wrong with us or our relationship.

But that’s simply not the case. In fact, it’s healthier to allow oneself to experience these feelings and then let them go.

When you suppress these feelings, you give them power over you, you let them dictate your behavior for you (suppression) rather than dictating your behavior for yourself (feeling them and yet choosing not to do anything).

People who suppress these urges are the ones who are likely to eventually succumb to them and give in and suddenly find themselves screwing the secretary in the broom closet and having no idea how they got there and come to deeply regret it about twenty-two seconds afterward.

People who suppress these urges are the ones who are likely to project them onto their partner and becoming blindingly jealous, attempting to control their partner’s every thought and whim, corralling all of their partner’s attention and affection onto themselves.

People who suppress these urges are the ones who are likely to wake up one day disgruntled and frustrated with no conscious understanding of why, wondering where all of the days went and remember how in love we used to be?

Looking at attractive people is enjoyable. Speaking to attractive people is enjoyable. Thinking about attractive people is enjoyable. That’s not going to change because of our Facebook relationship status. And when you dampen these impulses towards other people, you dampen them towards your partner as well. You’re killing a part of yourself and it ultimately only comes back to harm your relationship.

When I meet a beautiful woman now, I enjoy it, as any man would. But it also reminds me why, out of all of the beautiful women I’ve ever met and dated, I chose to be with my girlfriend. I see in the attractive women everything my girlfriend has and most women lack. And while I appreciate the attention or even flirtation, the experience only strengthens my commitment. Attractiveness is common. But real intimacy is not.

When we commit to a person, we are not committing our thoughts, feelings or perceptions. We can’t control our own thoughts, feelings and perceptions the majority of the time, so how could we ever make that commitment?

What we control are our actions. And what we commit to that special person are our actions. Let everything else come and go, as it inevitably will.

5. Spending time apart

You see it all the time: the man who meets his girlfriend and stops playing basketball and hanging out with his friends, or the woman who suddenly decides she loves every comic book and video game her boyfriend likes even though she doesn’t know how to hold the XBox controller properly. We all have that friend who mysteriously ceased to exist as soon as they got into their relationship. And it’s troubling, not just for us but for them.

blonde woman on the beachWhen we fall in love we develop irrational beliefs and desires. One of these desires is to allow our lives to be consumed by the person we’re infatuated with. This feels great. It’s intoxicating in much of the same way cocaine is intoxicating (no, really). The problem only arises when this actually happens.

The problem with allowing your identity to be consumed by a romantic relationship is that as you change to be closer to the person you love, you cease to be the person they fell in love with in the first place.

It’s important to occasionally get some distance from your partner, assert your independence, maintain some hobbies or interests that are just yours. Have some separate friends. Take an occasional trip somewhere by yourself. Remember what made you you and what drew you to your partner in the first place. Without this space, without this oxygen to breathe, the fire between the two of you will die out and what were once sparks will become only friction.

6. Accepting your partner's flaws

In his famous book The Unbearable Lightness of Being, Milan Kundera said there are two types of womanizers: 1) men who are looking for the perfect woman and can never find her, and 2) men who convince themselves that every woman they meet is already perfect.

I love this observation and believe it applies to not just womanizers, but just about anyone who consistently finds themselves in dysfunctional relationships. They either try to make their partner be perfect by “fixing” them or changing them. Or they delude themselves into thinking that their partner is already perfect.

This is one of those things that is not nearly as complicated as it feels. Let’s break it down:

  1. Every person has flaws and imperfections.
  2. You can’t ever force a person to change.
  3. Therefore: You must date somebody who has flaws you can live with or even appreciate.

The most accurate metric for your love of somebody is how you feel about their flaws. If you accept them and even adore some of their shortcomings — her obsessive cleanliness, his awkward social ticks — and they can accept and even adore some of your shortcomings, well, then that’s a sign of true intimacy.

One of the best expressions of this idea came from Plato in the form of a myth. In his Symposium, Plato wrote that humans were originally androgynous and whole. There were no men or women. They felt no lack, no uncertainty, and they were powerful, so powerful that they rose up and challenged the gods themselves.

This posed a problem for the gods. They didn’t want to completely wipe out the human race as they’d have no one to rule over. But at the same time they had to do something to humble and distract humanity.

So Zeus split them in half. He split each human into a man and a woman and doomed them to spend their brief mortal existence wandering the world looking for their other half, the half that would make them feel whole and powerful again. And this wholeness came not from two perfections meeting, but two imperfections meeting, two imperfections that both complemented and compensated for one another’s shortcomings.

The artist Alex Grey once said that, “True love is when two people’s pathologies complement one another’s.” Love is, by definition, crazy and irrational. And the best love works when our irrationalities complement one another and our flaws enamor one another.

It may be our perfections that attract one another. But it’s our imperfections that decide whether we stay together or not.

SEE ALSO: 6 Toxic Relationship Habits Most People Think Are Healthy

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This simple exercise will work out every muscle in your body

This memory-linking technique can help you remember anyone's name

$
0
0

networkingThe most effective leaders are the ones who make you feel like they're really listening. Most importantly, they always remember names.

So how can you get better at remembering them? Business Insider attended a Dale Carnegie training class and learned the secret to remembering names

Carnegie, known for his 1936 bestseller "How to Win Friends and Influence People," passed away in 1955. But his self-improvement courses have trained more than eight million people, including billionaire Warren Buffett.

According to the lecturer leading the course we attended, the best way to remember someone's name is to incorporate things you know about the person into a mental picture that reminds you of the name — the more exaggerated the image, the easier it is to remember.

Carnegie writes in his book "Public Speaking and Influencing Men in Business" that "the secret of a good memory is thus the secret of forming diverse and multiple associations with every fact we care to retain." Our minds are essentially "associate machines", and the reason it's hard to remember people's names is because there's no meaning behind the name for the listener.

Carnegie's memory-linking technique is to picture images that sound like a person's name — and combine it with other things you know about them.

For instance, if you meet someone named Laura from Brazil, imagine her with a laurel wreath on her head swimming in the Amazon River.

Similarly, you could combine these elements in a ridiculous phrase. 

To remember that Mr. O. W. Dolittle sells cars for a living, for example, you can remember the phrase "do little and you won't succeed in selling cars." For Mr. Thomas Fischer who works in coal, you can remember the phrase "he fishes for coal orders." And if you meet a scientist named Matt, you can remember him as "the Matt scientist," which sounds like "the mad scientist."

Although these exercises may sound silly, Carnegie says they are proven to work.

Indeed, three-time US memory champion Nelson Dellis told Forbes he uses the same technique to remember names. In competitions, Dellis must memorize a list of 99 names and be able to successfully match them to faces.

Creating a mental image is the best way to get the information to stick, he said, and he usually thinks of an image that incorporates a memorable physical feature, like a prominent nose or unique hair style. 

It's also important to confirm you've heard the name correctly and to use it in conversation to truly cement it in your brain. 

This is an update of an article originally written by Vivian Giang.

SEE ALSO: What to do if you forget someone's name immediately after meeting them

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: 5 ways to change your body language to make people like you

There are scientifically proven ways to make someone fall in love with you

$
0
0

We've talked about how you can get someone to be attracted to you by using scientifically proven flirting techniques, but how can you get someone to fall in love with you? We talked to psychotherapist and author M. Gary Neuman who cites five scientifically proven ways to transcend simple attractiveness and inspire the feelings that could lead to a long-term connection.

Business Insider readers get a 20% discount on Neuman's products for a limited time by using the promo code "businessinsider." Click here to visit his website.

Produced by Graham Flanagan with camera by Devan Joseph.

Follow BI Video: On Facebook

Join the conversation about this story »

A social psychologist reveals why so many marriages are falling apart and how to fix it

$
0
0

Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt

Marriage has always been a gamble, but the modern game is harder and with higher stakes than ever before.

Research has revealed, for example, that people in a healthy marriage are some of the happiest couples in history.

Whereas those who are struggling in their marriage are more unhappy today than in the past.

When social psychologist Eli Finkel sought to understand why marriage is more extreme at both ends today than in the past, he discovered something intriguing and disturbing:

Marriages in the US are more challenging today than at any other time in our country's history.

The suffocation of marriage

Finkel is a professor of social psychology at Northwestern University and is known for developing a surprisingly simple marriage-saving procedure, which takes 21 minutes a year.

Together with his colleagues of the Relationships and Motivation LAB at Northwestern, Finkel and his team have gone on to publish several papers on what they call "the suffocation model of marriage in America."

In one of their latest papers on this front, they explain why — compared to previous generations — some of the defining qualities of today's marriages make it harder for couples to cultivate a flourishing relationship.

The simple answer is that people today expect more out of their marriage. If these higher expectations are not met, it can suffocate a marriage to the point of destroying it.

The 3 models of marriage

brad pitt angelina jolie mr and mrs. smithFinkel, in an opinion article in The New York Times summarizing their latest paper on this model, discusses the three distinct models of marriage that relationship psychologists refer to:

  • institutional marriage (from the nation's founding until 1850)
  • companionate marriage (from 1851 to 1965)
  • self-expressive marriage (from 1965 onward)

Before 1850, people were hardly walking down the aisle for love — the point of marriage was mostly for food production, shelter, and protection from violence.

People were often satisfied if they felt any emotional connection to their spouse at all, Finkel wrote.

By the turn of the 20th century, however, those norms changed quickly when an increasing number of people left the farm to live and work in the city for higher pay and fewer hours.

With the luxury of more free time, Americans focused on what they wanted in a lifelong partner, namely companionship and love. But the counter-cultural attitude of the 1960s led Americans to think of marriage as an option instead of an essential step in life.

Marriage today

as good as it gets jack nicholson with puppyThis leads us to today's model, self-expressive marriage, wherein the average modern, married American is looking not only for love from their spouse but for a sense of personal fulfillment.

Finkel writes that this era's marriage ideal can be expressed in the simple quote "You make me want to be a better man," from James L. Brooks' 1997 film "As Good as It Gets."

These changes to marital expectations have been a mixed bag, Finkel argues.

"As Americans have increasingly looked to their marriage to help them meet idiosyncratic, self-expressive needs, the proportion of marriages that fall short of their expectations has grown, which has increased rates of marital dissatisfaction,"Finkel's team writes, in their latest paper.

On the other hand, "those marriages that succeed in meeting these needs are particularly fulfilling, more so than the best marriages in earlier eras."

The key to a successful marriage

mr and mrs smith brad pitt angelina jolieSo, what's the key to a successful, flourishing marriage?

Finkel and his colleagues describe three general options:

  • Don't look to your marriage alone for personal fulfillment. In addition to your spouse, use all resources available to you including friends, hobbies, and work.
  • If you want a lot from your marriage, then you have to give a lot, meaning that to meet their high expectations, couples must invest more time and psychological resources into their marriage.
  • And if neither of those options sound good, perhaps it's time to ask less of the marriage and adjust high expectations for personal fulfillment and self discovery.

Other researchers, like sociologist Jeffrey Dew, support the notion that time is a crucial factor in sustaining a successful marriage.

Dew, who is a professor at the University of Virginia, found that Americans in 1975 spent, on average, 35 hours a week alone with their spouse while couples in 2003 spent 26 hours together.

Child-rearing couples in 1975 spent 13 hours a week together, alone, compared to couples in 2003 who spent 9 hours a week together. The divorce rate in America was 32.8% in 1970 and rose to 49.1% by 2000.

While that doesn't necessarily mean less time together led to divorce — or that the people who stayed together were happy — Finkel's research suggests that higher expectations and less investment in the relationship may be a toxic brew.

SEE ALSO: This is the single best diet for your overall health

UP NEXT: 15 healthy eating habits that work according to scientists

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: There are scientifically proven ways to make someone fall in love with you

A psychological trick to get anyone to like you

$
0
0

networking

In "Thinking, Fast and Slow," psychologist Daniel Kahneman introduces the concept of "exaggerated emotional coherence," or what you've probably come to know as the "halo effect."

The halo effect is "the tendency to like (or dislike) everything about a person — including things you have not observed"— based on one trait or experience with them.

He gives an example of meeting someone at a party who is later asked for a donation. If you like her, you will likely rate her as more generous, and if you don't, you will likely rate her as less generous.

Essentially, people tend to assess other people's traits based on early emotional impressions rather than first assessing the traits and then forming an emotional impression.

So first impressions become especially important.

Kahneman asks: What do you think of Alan and Ben?

  • Alan is intelligent, industrious, impulsive, critical, stubborn, and envious.
  • Ben is enviousstubborncriticalimpulsiveindustrious, and intelligent.

It turns out most people rate Alan much more favorably than Ben, even though the traits are the same but listed in reverse order. In fact, the stubbornness of the person who is first viewed as intelligent sometimes evokes respect, Kahneman writes, while intelligence in an envious stubborn person is often thought to make him more dangerous.

The sequence in which we observe characteristics of a person, despite often being by chance, increases the weight of first impressions.

So in a job interview, for example, you'd want to start by presenting your agreeableness, or likability. Then the hiring manager will likely rate your intelligence higher than another equally smart and qualified applicant who didn't start by eliciting a positive emotion.

But in certain contexts where you need current knowledge to make that positive first impression, such as being up to date on what's going on in the world, what should you do?

David Epstein, author of the popular book "The Sports Gene" and an editor of the new sports newsletter TipOff, says keeping up to date with important topics in the news is a great way to create a positive initial halo effect, whether you're attempting to connect with your colleagues around the water cooler or trying to impress a first date.

"Like it or not, sports news makes for great small talk," says Epstein, who is also a former Sports Illustrated writer. "And you only need to know a little to make an instant emotional connection with a sports fan. There's a reason 'How 'bout them Cowboys, or Cubs, or Dodgers?' is a conversation starter as ubiquitous as talking about the weather. It's a sliver of instant intimacy."

If Kahneman is right, that might be all it takes to put the halo in place.

Jonathan Wai, PhD, is a psychologist, writer, and research scientist at the Duke University Talent Identification Program.

SEE ALSO: 9 things you're doing that make people dislike you immediately

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: 5 ways to change your body language to make people like you


Here's how people's sex lives change over the course of a relationship

$
0
0

Barcelona fans people couple

For the first six months of a relationship, there seems to be a kind of learning curve in a couple's sex life, a new study found. It takes time to get to know what a new partner likes.

The next six months are a relationship's sexual prime: Couples in the study reported the highest satisfaction with their sex lives during this time.

But after that first year, sexual satisfaction slowly declines.

The study, published in the January issue of the Archives of Sexual Behavior, involved about 2,800 heterosexual German adults between 25 and 41, who were queried every year for three years. All of the participants were in relationships.

The results were the same for married and unmarried couples, the researchers found. As expected, people who said that their relationships were high-quality also reported higher sexual satisfaction as a whole.

The researchers didn't find any differences between men's and women's satisfaction. Everyone seemed to peak around six months into the relationship. Figuring out why this trend occurs will require further study.

But there were also some limitations to the researchers' conclusions.

It's impossible to know, for example, if couples' sex lives get better again after three years, or if the results would have been different for gay couples, older couples, or people in other countries. The researchers also relied on people's honest answers to what most would consider a very personal question: "How satisfied are you with your sex life?"

SEE ALSO: Giving thanks could be the key to lasting relationships

DON'T MISS: Here's how often you should have sex in your relationship to be the happiest

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: The 6 basic elements of a thriving relationship

These 2 words could reveal if you're a bad listener

$
0
0

couple talking

Let's pretend you're in a relationship, and your girlfriend is telling you about how terrible her day was.

Her boss didn't say "Thank you" once, the intern screwed up her lunch order, and she didn't realize until 4 p.m. that her shoes didn't match.

Right now, she's venting, which means you should be listening.

According to Adam McHugh, however, there's a pretty good chance you're doing it all wrong.

McHugh is the author of "The Listening Life: Embracing Attentiveness in a World of Distraction," in which he outlines a dozen traps people can fall into if they don't approach listening in the right way. One of those is what McHugh calls "The Password."

Here's how he describes it: "The listener sits quietly through the speaker's conversation, but then seizes on one word that she uses, amid a sea of paragraphs, and treats it as a password that unlocks a whole new conversation."

This new conversation bears no similarity to the prior one, and it typically begins with two words cleverly masked in relatability: "Speaking of ..."

"Speaking of tuna casserole, I remember my mom served the worst tuna casserole at my high school graduation party," a password-seeking person might say after a loved one begins lamenting a failed new recipe.

"Speaking of getting embarrassed, my face turns so red when I get embarrassed," the bad listener offers.

These responses may seem like a way to identify with the speaker's problems —Hey, you're not alone! — but McHugh argues they are deceptively selfish.

The password trap isn't unforgivable — most bad listeners would probably say their intentions are good, McHugh says."They would say that they sat quietly and let the other person talk before chiming in and therefore they listened successfully," he explains. "The problem is that silence and listening are not the same thing."

If you're listening to someone get upset about a tuna casserole or an embarrassing moment and your brain is searching for a way to steer the conversation away from the problem, you aren't listening.

Or, if you are listening in such a way "that the speaker must make an abrupt shift to listen," McHugh says — instead of getting to discuss his or her problems freely — "you are not doing it right."

Good listeners are patient and unselfish, and they can recognize when it's their turn to speak. When they do so, they provide reassuring commentary or ask gentle, probing questions. 

That is the express lane to conflict resolution.

SEE ALSO: Why copying the habits of high achievers won't make you more successful

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: NASA scientists are baffled by a mysterious pyramid structure they found in space

Scientists asked 2,799 people from 12 countries to define ‘happiness’ — here’s what they said

$
0
0

Happy

You know when you're happy and you know when you aren't, but what really is happiness, and what exactly takes us to that joyous state? Psychologists from twelve different countries teamed up to discern a global perspective.

Their findings were just published to the journal Frontiers in Psychology.

The researchers comprehensively surveyed and queried 2,799 adults living in urban areas of Argentina, Brazil, Croatia, Hungary, India, Italy, Mexico, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, South Africa, and the United States about their definitions of happiness.

Between 200 and 220 adults aged thirty to sixty participated from each country, split evenly between men and women. Eight out of ten of the participants had children. Slightly over half were Christian, 12.4% were Hindu, and 27.6% didn't belong to a religion.

From the 7,551 definitions of happiness provided by the participants, the researchers distilled a number of findings.

Overall, and in eleven of the twelve countries surveyed, subjects said that family and strong relationships contributed to happiness the most, followed by good health. People most often described family as a source of solidarity, cohesion, and mutual support, and reported contentment from watching their children grow into strong, positive individuals. Strong relationships were valued as a way of sharing life experiences, as well as giving and receiving support.

Worldwide, participants most often gave a psychological definition of happiness. Of these definitions, the notion of harmony dominated, including the components of inner peace, inner balance, contentment, and psychophysical well-being. This surprised the researchers somewhat, as the almost Zen-like idea of harmony is often neglected in psychological research on happiness, especially in the Western world. Harmony was regularly characterized by participants as achieving emotional stability, "being attuned with the universe," and attaining a balance between what is desired and what is achieved.

There were a number of interesting cultural differences that arose in participants' definitions. Subjects from the US described happiness as a state of "no negative feelings" and associated it with "optimism" more than residents of any other country, whereas residents of Norway particularly cared about "autonomy" and attaining "mastery" in certain skills or other aspects of life. In Croatia, the poorest country on the list, participants focused less on psychological definitions of happiness and more on simply being healthy and satisfied in day-to-day life.

The study had a number of limitations. Participants were from urban areas, so perspectives from those living in rural areas are absent. Moreover, cultures from Asia, Africa, and Latin America were undersampled, and there were almost no viewpoints from Muslims.

The researchers hope their study will lead to more happiness across the globe.

"As most people now live in multi-cultural societies, a deeper understanding of cultural notions of happiness and well-being will be valuable to promote harmonious existence and well-being for all diverse groups within the same country."

Source: Delle Fave A, Brdar I, Wissing MP, Araujo U, Castro Solano A, Freire T, Hernández-Pozo M, Jose P, Martos T, Nafstad HE, Nakamura J, Singh K and Soosai-Nathan L (2016). Lay definitions of happiness across nations: The primacy of inner harmony and relational connectedness. Front. Psychol. 7:30. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00030

SEE ALSO: 19 tiny life changes you can make right now for a healthier year

CHECK OUT: 10 science-backed life hacks you can teach yourself in under 5 minutes

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: A relationship expert reveals the key to a thriving relationship

A psychologist who’s studied married couples for decades says this is the best way to argue

$
0
0

couple joking

When's the last time you really got into it with your significant other? After the yelling was done, did your mind swirl with ideas about what you should have said? Or perhaps about what you should not have said?

Here's the good news: Not only can you most likely rectify the situation, knowing how to approach the argument next time can mean you and your partner have a more productive — and perhaps less volatile — "discussion."

Productive arguments, in fact, are one of the things that appear to distinguish couples who stay together from those who split, according to research from several psychologists, including University of Washington psychology professor John Gottman, founder of the Gottman Institute, an organization dedicated to studying and improving relationships.

Together with University of California, Berkeley psychologist Robert Levenson, Gottman conducted a 14-year study of 79 married couples living across the US Midwest.

Among the couples they studied, 21 ended up divorcing over the more-than-decade-long period. But among those who stuck it out, Gottman and Levenson noticed some key things about their relationships, including how they fought. Here are some of the key takeaways:

How couples who stay together argue

1. They stabilize a rocking boat

sailboat

Among the couples who split, the vast majority took far longer to address a recent argument than those who stayed together, often leaving each other to stew in individual thoughts for hours or days after a fight, Gottman told Business Insider. Conversely, couples who stayed together would typically discuss their arguments almost immediately after they'd happened.

Picture yourself and your partner in a boat, Gottman suggested. Now, imagine that the emotions you and your partner are feeling are represented by the sea around you. A small argument stirs the waters a bit and gets the boat rocking. But a quick effort to stabilize the boat — with an open conversation or an apology — can be all that's required to get you back to smooth sailing.

Waiting around, on the other hand, only strengthens the waves. And waiting too long, he said, can lead to disaster.

To calm a rocking boat, Gottman suggests you and your partner talk immediately and openly about what just happened. This requires recognizing that both of you are partially responsible for the problem and both of you are responsible for making amends.

2. They allow the other person to be heard

couple jokingAnother characteristic of couples who later divorced that Gottman observed is that they'd frequently cut off discussions about a conflict prematurely with unhelpful, insensitive comments. But strong couples tended to consistently approach one another with an open mind, taking responsibility for their actions and listening to what their partner had to say.

So if, in the middle of an argument, you stop your partner to them they're being illogical, you're probably doing it wrong.  

"If you tell someone they're not being logical or say something like 'you're getting off track,' it just doesn't work. It makes people angry," said Gottman. Instead, saying something like: "I can see that this is really important to you; tell me more" allows the other person to feel heard.

What other research says

More recent psychological research builds upon Gottman and Levenson's work.

A study of 145 couples published in the Journal of Counseling Psychology last year found that couples who received trainings on how to address conflicts immediately and with clear communication felt more satisfied with their relationship a year down the road than couples who didn't get the training. Those who didn't receive the training were also more likely to see their interactions deteriorate over the year they were reporting back to the researchers.

And a 2010 study published in the Journal of Marriage and Family which looked at 373 married couples found that, when both partners engaged positively during an argument — meaning they discussed the topic calmly and made an effort to listen to their partner and better understand his or her feelings — they were far less likely to divorce than couples where there was no positive engagement or when only one partner would engage positively. The results held steady as far as 16 years down the road.

So next time you feel an argument escalating, try one of these tactics. It might restore some calm to your relationship, or even help keep your boat from capsizing.

UP NEXT: Scientists say one behavior is the 'kiss of death' for a relationship

RELATED: A social psychologist reveals why so many marriages are falling apart and how to fix it

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Here's how much sex happy couples have every month

The man behind Grindr — the dating app that a Chinese gaming company just bought

$
0
0

Joel Simkhai is a single, gay man living in Los Angeles, and he's the king of Grindr. Well, technically, he's the CEO and founder of the dating app for gay and bisexual men. In 2009, he launched Grindr out of a "selfish desire" to meet more gay men.

More recently, he sold a majority stake of Grindr to a Chinese gaming company. Simkhai, still a very regular user of his own app, took us around LA last summer. He showed us what it's like to be the king of Grindr.

Produced by Will Wei

Follow TI:On Facebook

Join the conversation about this story »

The amazing benefits of a long-distance relationship and how to make it work

$
0
0

The-Notebook-Valentine's-Day

Today, about 3 million married Americans and as many as half of US college students are in a long-distance relationship— but don't feel too bad for them.

Scientific studies show that couples in long-distance relationships can be equally, if not more, satisfied as geographically-close couples.

Not only that, long-distance couples are more likely to share meaningful thoughts and feelings, and therefore, experience a deeper sense of emotional intimacy, according to one study of 63 college students.

But not everyone can thrive in this kind of romantic commitment.

Emma Dargie, a professor of psychology at Queen's University who has studied hundreds of long-distance daters, says that the single best advice for maintaining a healthy, long-distance relationship is communication.

"Establish the needs of each partner early on, practice working towards meeting those needs, and give feedback about which needs are still being unmet," Dargie told Business Insider in an email.

These needs can include agreeing on anything from on how often the couple communicates to how frequently they take time to see each other in person. In fact, it's important to set dates for meet ups, Dargie said. Going long distance with no end in sight can be trickier.

"Those who are certain of when they will be in the same city as their partner … seem to cope better with the distance," she said.

The hardest part

long distance relationshipDargie, along with a team of researchers at Queen's University, published a paper in 2014 that compared relationship quality between long-distance couples and geographically-close couples.

In their study, the researchers gave 474 females and 243 males in long-distance relationships a series of questions on topics including intimacy, commitment, communication, and sexual satisfaction (or lack thereof).

The researchers asked the same questions of 314 females and 111 males who lived near their partner.

In the end, Dargie and her colleagues found no difference in the quality of the relationship for either type of couple. Oddly enough, they found that for long-distance couples, the farther apart each partner was from the other geographically, the higher their level of satisfaction, intimacy, and communication was.

This suggests that the hardest part about long-distance relationships is not the distance itself, Dargie said.

"According to our research, it's not necessarily how far apart you are or how little you see your partners," she explained. "It's more about the discrepancy between your expectations for relationships and the reality of your current situation."

In addition to her research, Dargie is an expert on long-distance romance from personal experience. In fact, part of the reason she began researching this type of relationship is because she was in a long-distance relationship at the time.

"There was not, and still is not, a great deal of research on the topic, so my partner and we were just stumbling through as best we could. Ultimately, that relationship ended," Dargie said. "Although it would be tempting to blame the long distance for that dissolution, I now see that the relationship had just run its course."

Technology to the rescue

long distance relationshipWhile long-distance relationships are nothing new and faraway lovers have historically stayed in touch via letters and phone calls, recent technology — especially the internet — means it's possible to regularly see and communicate with your partner even if you can't be with them physically.

The study of 63 couples, published in the Journal of Communication in 2013, found that digital media, like video chatting and texting, may help couples achieve healthy long-distance relationships — at least among younger daters.

(The average age of research participants was 21, and the authors cautioned in the paper that "the sample of tech-savvy college students may limit the generalizability of the conclusions.")

The study analyzed 876 diary entries detailing the couples' day-to-day interactions. Roughly half of the couples were in long-distance relationships. Although the people in a long-distance did not interact as frequently throughout the day, their interactions were longer and more intimate.

"If being geographically apart is inevitable, people should not despair," Crystal Jiang, an assistant professor at City University of Hong Kong and coauthor of the paper, told the Huffington Post. "They are capable of communicating intimacy."

Some more advice

drew barrymore in going the distance movieIn any relationship, but especially in long-distance relationships, it's important to understand that your partner has a life outside of the relationship.

While making time for talking and being together is crucial, it's also important to spend time with friends and family.

"There is likely little that people will be able to do in order to change their long distance status, but if they devote their time to filling their lives with good people and fun activities, that absence may feel less pronounced," Dargie told Business Insider. "Plus, that gives much more to talk about during phone and/or Skype dates!"

 

SEE ALSO: Here's why marriage is harder than ever

LEARN MORE: Why you should never give your partner the silent treatment

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Research Reveals Why Men Cheat, And It's Not What You Think

A dating expert reveals why you shouldn't date your type


There's one quality in men that women find even more attractive than good looks

$
0
0

Angelina-Jolie, Brad-Pitt

What does a woman want in a man?

The question has long baffled many single males, leading some to bitterly conclude that handsome guys have an insurmountable advantage.

Not so, concludes a newly published study.

It shows women do indeed find good-looking men desirable—but if they have to choose, they'll probably pick the altruistic guy over the hunk.

The results provide "further evidence of the importance of altruism in women's mate choice preferences," a research team led by the University of Worcester's Daniel Farrelly writes in the journal Evolutionary Psychology. It confirms that selflessness is "a highly important characteristic trait women look for in long-term partners."

The study featured 202 straight women recruited online, most of whom were in their early 20s. They looked at 12 sets of photographs, each of which showed the faces of two men—one handsome, the other much less so.

The images were accompanied by scenarios, eight of which described situations where altruism—or its absence—played a key role. One typical scenario read as follows: "Two people are walking through a busy town, and notice a homeless person sitting near a cafe. Person E decides to go into the cafe to buy a sandwich and a cup of tea to give to the homeless person outside. Person F pretends to use his mobile phone and walks straight past the homeless person."

The altruistic behavior was ascribed to the handsome man in some scenarios, and the not-so-handsome man in others. In still others, neutral behavior was attributed to both, allowing researchers to determine the importance of looks when the guys were described in similar terms.

After scanning the photos and reading the scenarios, the women rated (on a one-to-five scale) how attractive they found each man, for both a brief affair or a committed romantic relationship.

"Individuals who displayed high levels of altruism were rated significantly more desirable overall," the researchers write. While the self-absorbed guys were viewed as more attractive candidates for a one-night stand—suggesting a night with a "bad boy" retains its short-term appeal—altruistic guys were rated as "more desirable for long-term relationships."

george clooney amal clooney golden globes

"Men who were just altruistic were rated as more desirable than men who were just attractive," Farrelly and his colleagues add. "If a man possesses only one of those traits, it is altruism that is more valuable."

What's more, "being both attractive and altruistic made a man more desirable than just the sum of the two desirable parts," the researchers report. A handsome guy volunteering at a soup kitchen will catch a lot of women's eyes.

This research is consistent with a German study we reported on last year, which found engaging in altruistic behavior increases the odds you'll find a romantic partner the following year.

This latest research also offers encouraging news to all those bitter guys on the Internet whose resentment toward women stems from romantic rejection: Maybe you're not being turned down because of your looks, but because of your attitude.

Instead of wasting time writing nasty comments, why not help someone in need? You might find you're more attractive than you realized.

SEE ALSO: Here's how people's sex lives change over the course of a relationship

DON'T MISS: A Harvard scientist says these 3 things could help you lead a longer, healthier life

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: How to use math to find the ideal spouse

A Harvard psychologist says people judge you based on 2 criteria when they first meet you

$
0
0

amy cuddyPeople size you up in seconds, but what exactly are they evaluating?

Harvard Business School professor Amy Cuddy has been studying first impressions alongside fellow psychologists Susan Fiske and Peter Glick for more than 15 years, and has discovered patterns in these interactions.

In her new book "Presence," Cuddy says people quickly answer two questions when they first meet you:

  • Can I trust this person?
  • Can I respect this person?

Psychologists refer to these dimensions as warmth and competence respectively, and ideally you want to be perceived as having both.

Interestingly, Cuddy says that most people, especially in a professional context, believe that competence is the more important factor. After all, they want to prove that they are smart and talented enough to handle your business.

But in fact warmth, or trustworthiness, is the most important factor in how people evaluate you. "From an evolutionary perspective," Cuddy says, "it is more crucial to our survival to know whether a person deserves our trust." It makes sense when you consider that in cavemen days it was more important to figure out if your fellow man was going to murder you and steal all your possessions than if he was competent enough to build a good fire.

presenceWhile competence is highly valued, Cuddy says it is evaluated only after trust is established. And focusing too much on displaying your strength can backfire.

Cuddy says MBA interns are often so concerned about coming across as smart and competent that it can lead them to skip social events, not ask for help, and generally come off as unapproachable. These overachievers are in for a rude awakening when they don't get the job offer because nobody got to know and trust them as people.

"If someone you're trying to influence doesn't trust you, you're not going to get very far; in fact, you might even elicit suspicion because you come across as manipulative," Cuddy says. "A warm, trustworthy person who is also strong elicits admiration, but only after you've established trust does your strength become a gift rather than a threat."

SEE ALSO: A Harvard psychologist explains the key to spotting a liar

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: What to do with your hands during a job interview

A CEO shares 8 strategies to build better relationships

$
0
0

networking

When it came time to build her business, CatalystCreativ, Amanda Slavin took her masters degree in education and five years of hospitality experience, put them together and developed a whole new kind of creative agency. CatalystCreativ builds brands by focusing on engagement.

“When people are authentically engaged with your brand, they speak for it,” she tells us. Her agency helps brands tell their stories by creating experiences, like conferences and events, that help them interact with individual consumers as well as with the community.

As it turns out, the same concepts that Amanda uses to help brands engage with their customers are also essential to building better personal and professional relationships. She shed some light on the subject.

Build a happy, creative workplace

Work how and where you want

The CatalystCreativ team is all remote — people feel more engaged with their work if they can live and work where they want — but we’re constantly in contact and we share a calendar. We’re part of each others’ lives.

Be vulnerable 

As the CEO, I convey to my team that I’m vulnerable. This is something we train speakers to do when we’re planning conferences, because vulnerability is a key element to building authentic connections. It allows people to share and express themselves in a space where they’re not afraid. You should feel comfortable telling your CEO about personal circumstances because they impact your work.

Always look for learning opportunities

We offer our employees free mentorship for three months, in addition to enrolling them in leadership courses and funding their trips to attend conferences. At CatalystCreativ we’re all about being the best versions of ourselves, and part of doing so is constantly educating ourselves. The stronger we are as individuals, the stronger our work will be as a team.

mother listening to child

Raise engaged children

Do your own thing, then talk about it 

Read with your child for thirty minutes a day, but not the way you usually do — you read your book while she reads hers, then talk about it. The idea is that while you’re doing something that’s important to you, she’s doing something that’s important to her and when you’re both done you’ll share it with each other. She’ll be fully engaged in the activity, because she’ll be doing it all on her own, and when she’s done she’ll have the chance to tell you her thoughts, feelings and ideas.

You can also try thirty minutes of writing in your respective journals. I did this with my students when I was a teacher, and it was a great exercise in creativity, independence, writing and self-expression.

Let first-graders be first-graders

Children absorb a lot from us and know a lot more than we think they do. When I was teaching, every morning I’d ask my first-grade class to talk for one minute each about something in their lives other than school. You can do the same thing with your kids. Ask them questions like an adult: What are you feeling? What are you thinking about? What did you learn and what do you want to learn?

boss workplace

Be a better friend/coworker/neighbor, etc.

Teach each other

My boyfriend and I are constantly educating each other on things we’re both passionate about. I make sure to never shove anything down his throat, a rule that applies to everything from relationships to marketing and branding. Don’t say you need to read this or you have to do this. Give your partner the space to find what what he or she is passionate about.

Never think you know it all

Put away your preconceived ideas about a person or a group of people. Ask people to share their stories, rather than superimposing yours on them. Ask, “How are you?” and really listen. Always listen with your full attention and never, ever assume you know more than someone else.

Put yourself first

Work on yourself so that you’re not working on each other. In an argument, as soon as you feel yourself saying “You did this,” turn to yourself and ask, “Why does this bother me?” Use it as an opportunity to improve yourself, because that’s what will ultimately improve your relationship — and all your other relationships. When you’re your best self, you’re also the best mother, friend, sister, daughter, coworker, etc. you can be.

SEE ALSO: A CEO shares the framework he uses to hire the best employees possible

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: 5 ways to change your body language to make people like you

The scientific way to know someone is in love with you

$
0
0

young couple love

A wise Shakespeare mug once said that “love is merely madness” and when you’re in the throws of it, that certainly seems to be so.

Like Dimetapp, love tastes strange, is intoxicating, and can induce disorientation. The other side effect, of course, is neediness.

People in love are desperate to know if the stars have aligned to make their loves love them back.

There are more than a few pieces online about how to make an educated guess about your beloved’s intentions, but for serious answers, it’s best to ask a doctor for some suggestions and access to equipment.

Here’s what you don’t learn at middle school dances: If you need to know if someone loves you, an MRI scanner and some electrode sensors will clear things up. After all, love is not so strange that science can’t track it in our brain.

Forget about stressing about if they don’t text you back: It’s literally what’s happening on the inside that matters.

Love is thought to happen in three stages: lust, attraction, and attachment.

At each of these different points different organic chemicals and hormones are released in the body — testosterone and oestrogen drive the lust, dopamine in honeymoon phase; oxytocin and vasopressin when the real I want to be with you forever feelings come around.

The Luther Vandross behind the curtain is your brain, causing your sweaty palms and trembling voice.

Dr. Lucy Brown, a neuroscientist and clinical professor at the Einstein College of Medicine, is considered a pioneer in the neuroscience of romantic love.

One of the ways she studies how love affects the brain is through functional magnetic resonance imaging, or fMRI. A fMRI measures brain activity by looking at blood flow in the brain (much like weight lifting increases blood flow to your biceps, the flow of blood increases to the areas of the brain that are active).

When people experience love, their sympathetic nervous system is reacting — the same part of the brain that controls the fight or flight response.

couple love marriage holding hands relationships farm farmers

“If you think that someone might be really attracted to you, what’s going on in their brain is an activation of part of the brain called the ventral tegmental area, which is part of our reward and drive system,” says Brown to Inverse. “It’s the part of the brain that is active when people are drinking water after being really thirsty, or eating chocolate when they’re a chocoholic.”

“It’s rewarding this system if they’re attracted to you — they are going to begin to seek you out because they have this drive to be close to you.”

Brown’s work demonstrates that brain activation definitely differs even when someone is looking a picture of someone they love versus someone they feel neutral about. And the brain reacts differently when you think that movie star is hot instead of I actually want to be with this person: When you’re in love, the right ventral tegmental area of the brain stem is activated. If you just find someone handsome or beautiful, it’s the left.

Brown explains the difference comes down to the idea of wanting versus liking.

“When you want something and really need it, okay, that means you organize your life around it — you’re in love,” she explains. “But when you find something beautiful, like there’s something in a museum you find beautiful, you’re going to want to go there and you like it, but you’re not going to go there everyday.”

On the quest to see if someone is attracted to you, you could do well to measure their skin conductance and heart rate as well.

Professors Melanie Shoup-Knox and Nathan Pipitone had an idea from previous studies that men pay more attention to women who are at their monthly high points of fertility, but the biological underpinning that wasn’t clear.

So they studied the autonomic nervous system of both men and women listening to the voices of natural cycling women — not ladies on hormonal birth control — while monitoring heart rate and measuring their skin temperature.

They put electrodes on each arm of the subject, and then one on the ankle. The changes they saw were almost immediate.

Golden Gate Bridge San Francisco California USA America Relationship Couple

“We found out that there’s a sympathetic nervous system change that causes change in the electrical activity of the skin and changes in the heart rate when people hear this voice,” says Shoup-Knox to Inverse. “It happens to be that the voice is a peak ovulation amongst these women.”

While studies have consistently demonstrated that men are more compelled towards women who are at peak fertility, what Shoup-Knox and Piptone’s work demonstrates as that this heightened state of arousal causes a physiological change.

Interestingly enough, the voice of fertile woman affected heterosexual women’s nervous system as well — perhaps, Shoup-Knox postulates, because women need to be aware of who their mates are paying attention to.

If you don’t have a doctor at your disposal who can whisk your beau away for a love-examination, you’ll have to do make do with outwardly physical signs. Brown says a simple enough way to tell if someone is into you is if they are looking at you a lot — going back to the idea of the brain’s reward system that is very much urging them to be a bit of a creep.

Their sympathetic nervous system is also what lets you witness the sweaty palms, trembling voice or hands, and momentary eye pupil dilation or a fight or flight surge into romance. But perhaps the most surefire way to see if someone loves you, other than scanning their brain? Get a little ballsy.

“If you want to know if someone’s in love with you and you’re close enough to them to ask this question, the question to ask is, ‘What percentage of the day would you say you think about me?’” says Brown. “You want the answer to be something like ‘I cant stop thinking about you!’ or ‘80 percent of the day.’… That’s the way to know if someone is really into you.”

That or the machine.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: There are scientifically proven ways to make someone fall in love with you

How a 'sex schedule' could save your relationship

Viewing all 3141 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>